"...he knows he is my sun, but when he chooses to withhold his light, he would have my sky to be all darkness..."Male Behaviour?
I don't think we can doubt Arthur's enduring love for Helen in these chapters. He may behave despicably, and treat her shamefully, but he appears to remain completely in love with her. However, it is becoming increasingly clear that there is more than one type of love, and Arthur argues that it is a case of gender: "The cases are different...It is a woman's nature to be constant - to love one and one only, blindly, tenderly, and for ever...but you must have some commiseration for us, Helen; you must give us a little more licence..." He would have her believe that all his behaviour - disappearing indefinitely to London, flirting with Lady Lowborough, resenting his newborn child, overindulging with his friends etc. - all of this is simply MALE behaviour.
Double Standards
But there is a clear case of double standards here. For example, when Helen asks what Arthur would do if, for instance, Lord Lowborough were to flirt with her and kiss her hand, in full view of everyone, he replies that he would "blow his brains out". He also argues, "If you had not seen me...it would have done no harm", suggesting that he can do what he likes, provided that his wife does not find out. And he even goes so far as to suggest, in his attempt to divert the focus away from his own misdemeanours, that she is breaking her own marriage vows herself by not honouring and obeying him at all times.
Victorian Society
Now it is easy for us to condemn his behaviour, reading about it in 2006. But could it, perhaps, have been more 'acceptable' 150 years ago. Remember how different was women's role in society back then; think how fewer rights women had, and how many more restrictions were placed on their lives. Victorian men frequented alehouses and brothels at will, but their wives were expected to remain beacons of piousness and domesticity regardless. That was just the way things were.
* * * *
Or perhaps you think that it doesn't matter when the book is set: Arthur's behaviour is still completely wrong and totally unacceptable. If so, what do you think is the most unforgiveable of the things he does? What upsets you most about the way he treats his wife and child? I would be very interested to hear your opinions on this.
And what about the other plot developments? What exactly do you think Arthur is getting up to during his long sojourns in London? What is Mr Hargrave playing it, and are his intentions completely honourable? Do you think Arthur and Helen's marriage is beyond hope and help, or could they still turn things around?
NEXT WEEK: Only three chapters to read this week - Chapters 30, 31 and 32. But PLEASE can you all try to contribute more to this BLOG (either through COMMENTS about my entries, or, better still, through your OWN POSTS). I feel like I am doing all the work here... :(



